Part of the problem is due to the chronic overtiering in the destroyer area. Although the cruisers and battleships have been drafted well, the priorities concerning destroyers seem to have been rather specific from the beginning. I am not complaining about the absence of additions, but rather about what has been added. Is there an issue with the ship suggestion forum being filled with old ships from World War I? Or is it difficult to retrieve information about post-war Italian ships? As early as the 1950s, the Italian navy made determined efforts to build new ships armed with modern weaponry, such as the Indomito class and the San Giorgio class (ships with guns only, built in 1955). This raises the question of why all the trees that initially had decent destroyers were provided with post-war vessels, while Italy, which struggles in the destroyer department, received ships of questionable usefulness like the Aquila. Surprisingly, the German tree lacks post-war destroyers altogether. Japan only has one post-war destroyer, the Harukaze from 1956, while the already powerful American tree features the Mitscher, a formidable destroyer from 1954. The Russian tree offers the Bezuprechny from 1950, the Spokoinyy from 1956, and the Bravy from 1967. The British tree boasts three post-war destroyers: the Tobruk from 1950, the Daring from 1956, and the Diana from 1958. In contrast, other nations’ trees have seen the addition of post-war vessels.įor example, the French tree has had the Marceau, a post-war destroyer armed with German guns, dating back to 1950. However, one aspect remains unchanged: the bluewater Italian tree remains stuck in World War II, with the exception of the solitary premium ship, Geniere. The development of War Thunder is progressing, and numerous ships are being added with each patch to balance the various tech trees.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |